Clueless reporters, “experts” cannot distinguish Temple Mount from Al Aqsa Mosque
Here is a Reuters photo and caption:
Notice how heroic the young man looks! Notice the angle of the photo, with the photographer in front of the slinger – normally a dangerous place to be. How likely is it that this photo was staged just for Reuters?
Oh, about 99%.
But lets look at the caption. It claims that the reason for these clashes are because more Jews are visiting the Al Aqsa Mosque.
Only one problem: No Jews visit the Al Aqsa Mosque. Period.
Muslims like to refer to the entire Temple Mount as the Al Aqsa Mosque, and as a result Western “experts” often believe them. Here is the truth, as simply as I could show it:
Lest you think that Reuters is the only organization that parrots Arab lies about “Jews storming the Al Aqsa Mosque,” here is how Joe Stork, deputy director of Human Rights Watch’s Middle East and North Africa division, described Ariel Sharon’s 2000 visit to the Temple Mount in 2010:
Ariel Sharon’s provocative visit to the site of the Al Aqsa mosque in East Jerusalem on September 29, 2000, and the response of Israeli security forces to Palestinian protestors, led to sustained clashes involving Israeli forces and armed Palestinians in what became known as the Al Aqsa intifada, or uprising.
To describe the Temple Mount as merely “the site of the Al Aqsa Mosque” would be akin to calling Manhattan “the site of Central Park.” In fact, Human Rights Watch not once uses the proper term “Temple Mount” (or even the Arabic equivalent, “Haram al-Sharif”) on its website.
Yesterday, I tweeted HRW asking a simple question:
Of course, I didn’t get a response. Because the human rights of Jews to have access to their own holy sites are not as important as the threat of violence by Muslims, and HRW makes a mockery of its pretense to care about “human rights” when it makes such calculations. Unless a reporter corners a HRW representative and asks him this question point blank, we will never get an answer from them.